Agent Doherty: The Tactics files - Norwich

File Name: More Open than Jenny Thompson's Legs

Location: White Hart Lane

Date: April 9th

Opposition: Norwich

"Top of the evening to you, G-Doc back with another insight into Tottenham tactics. Bad times down at the Lane, and let's get to the first talking point. The captain, man of the moment, that oh-so-reliable centre back who defies injury to put in performance after performance slipped up badly over Easter, but enough about me, what about my old team mate Ledley King? The King, he is no more it seems.

In isolation it would seem my old mentee struggled, but if we delve deeper into matters on the pitch you'll find more than miles of tattoos and the smell of deep heat. Tottenham's problems, like most issues teams have, stem from the performance (or lack) of the midfield. Ready to go deeper still? Good, here we go....

Like an Ikea wardrobe built by a teenager, Tottenham's midfield did not hold together. The 4-4-2 - that formation closest to Harry's heart - has turned into an adulterous harlot, enticing the manager with its form and shape and simple beauty, only to turn out to be fucked by eleven men from Norfolk. There is nothing wrong with a 4-4-2 in principal as long as everyone works together. Partnerships can be forged between winger and full back, between the two strikers, central midfielders, centre backs etc, zonal marking makes up for the overloading of numbers in key areas, and attacking plans can be effected simply.

However, these partnerships have to work in defence as well as in attack. The centre forwards have to protect the central midfielders, who have to protect the centre backs; full backs should overlap or support wingers when going forward, and wingers should help the full back double up on the opposition's wide men. This did not happen.

Too many first balls were lost, but more critically too many second balls were lost. Norwich played a similar 4-4-2 which, judging by Harry's comments after the game (about his team's openness), the Spurs manager did not realise. Losing the second ball duel indicates a lack of determination and also a lack of team work, with team mates too far away from each other, allowing the opposition to close tightly on the ball and outnumber the Spurs men.

The increasingly ineffective Louis Saha (I'd have to get the stitching of my back pockets reinforced because if I was marking him that would be home for the 90 minutes) offers nothing defensively. He doesn't have the desire to press the opposition's defence nor drop back into midfield. The same can be said for Jermain Defoe, and the two front men were so close to each other both in attack and defence they might as well held each others hands to avoid getting lost. Both are poachers and unless given specific instructions will wait for others to do the work. An error on Harry's part.

The midfield hardly covered themselves in glory. Gareth Bale had one of those games were he thought the world owed him a living, and if he played in League One he would have got a Gazza-boot up his arse I tell you! Tracking back seemed beneath him, and he managed to float in a tear in the space-time continuum most of the time. Rather than put his nose in where others put their feet, the Welsh Wizard was another guilty party, waiting for the ball to be won by others and then laid off to him. In the 4-3-3 of recent times that is more acceptable, in a 4-4-2 the wingers have to put in a shift. I really feel for Assou-Ekotto because he has too many 1-on-1s to deal with.

On the opposite flank Aaron Lennon was less culpable, but had one of those games were he was too wide. I don't mind stretching the pitch but when the ball is going down the opposite flank and an attack is being mounted you need to get involved. As a world class defender I can tell you there is nothing better than having a speedy winger stick to the opposite touchline.

When the attack broke down he was too far away to get back, and uninterested in helping out the central midfielders. Again, in a 4-3-3 that is okay, not in this system. In both cases the wingers should have been instructed to get narrow when the team is defending.

In the centre, Jake Livermore had a good game but he is not yet ready to be Parker's replacement, and it was strange to see Sandro sitting on the bench. I can only assume he was rested. Livermore failed to press Elliot Bennett for Norwich's second goal, but rather than blame the young man I would ask what would have happened if he was constantly dragged out of the middle? A hole you big enough to fit every tractor this side of Ipswich in, that's what.

Even with Parker in the middle, Spurs can be woefully open, and this was exacebated on Monday by the abysmal performance of Luka Modric. Outmuscled, outfought, outworked, the Croatian did little to help Livermore or the defence stem the flow of Green coming at them. Often he was caught jogging back ten to fifteen yards behind the play, and his lax attitude was symptomatic of too many Spurs players.

Changes at half time and 70 minutes improved Tottenham slightly, but the team could not defend and were lucky to only concede two. Redknapp bemoaned the openness of his time but any fool, even David Pleat, could have told you that such a loose team with no clear direction would struggle against an opposition who put up even half a fight. Tottenham's recent results have not matched their performances, and this game was int he same vain, except this time Spurs should have lost by more than one goal.

The manager has to take much of the blame but not for one moment should the players think they have avoided the heat. Redknapp should know better than most that formations and tactics are not the same thing, and while he might point out to the goalless draw at Stamford Bridge or the 3-1 win against Swansea, fact is the other results in the last month prove that it isn't the formation that's the problem, it's team shape, roles given to individual players, and most troubling of all the basic lack of effort put in by too many players.


Spurs face Chelsea on sunday and I would not be surprised if my old team go out there and do the business. A derby match, at Wembley, with the chance to get to a final? You bet the players will be up for that, which only goes to add to the insult of Monday's performance. You can have as easy run in as you like but if you don't match the effort of the opposition, you will not get anywhere.

I expect Redknapp to adopt the tactics he employed at the Bridge, and with good reason, but the top teams have more than just a Plan A. As I said before, when Redknapp puts some preparation in the natural skill of his team does the rest, but when he scribbles down a line up ten minutes before kick off his team will get exposed. People know they are vulnerable, fortunately they face a Chelsea team on sunday who have problems of their own.

Sod the Opposition, Respect the Game

Handshake furore makes grown men look like kids.

Nice to see we have our priorities in order. When racism creeps back into our game, the England manager resigns on a point of principal, the FA acts on a point of principal, and Harry Redknapp shows the ineptitude of Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs (in one way or another), we all get our knickers in a twist over a handshake or two.

Some say the pre-match ritual of shaking hands with your opponent is redundant. It's meaningless, we wouldn't miss it if it were gone, but these same people agree handshakes should be exchanged after the game. The thought occurs that a handshake, before or after the game, is materially the same. Why can't you respect an opponent before the game as well as after? Only when you've tried to metaphorically (and sometimes literally) kick the shit out of someone can you respect them. Nonsense.

If the handshake is meaningless why do people feel the need to go out of their way to avoid it? Why did the FA feel the need to cancel the pre-match handshake between QPR and Chelsea? Why did some QPR players, Wayne Bridge, Luis Suarez or Rio Ferdinand not shake hands? If it's something that has absolutely no impact on life in any guise, why be a dick about it? Next we won't have players sharing the same tunnel, the same stadium, the same car maker, watch designer, or the same wag.

Personally I think the handshake is important. The pre-match handshake signifies the start of the contest, a sign that while the other team is an opponent they are also a footballer. That as much as player X represents one team, player Y represents the other, and hopefully the game will be played in the right manner and the opponent, whoever they may be, will be treated fairly and with respect (as a footballer, not necessarily as the person they are away from the game).

Just because you shake someone's hand does not mean you condone their actions. Football is not about John Terry or Luis Suarez or Patrice Evra or Bradley Woods-Garness (Sutton Utd player before you ask), the game is much, much bigger. If I was lined up against someone who I personally disliked, I would not avoid shaking their hand, because that says more about me than it does about them. I applaud Patrice Evra for trying to shake Suarez's hand on Saturday because it showed that no matter what someone else did, Evra was not going to let that change who he is. If I had a problem with John Terry I would not want to show he had got to me; in fact I would grip his hand tighter, let him know he was in a fight (then I'd yank his hand towards me, pulling him off balance and making him look a fool).

Professional footballers have a responsibility, a responsibility to the game and the next generation of players who are playing in the schools and the parks across the country. Rather than be dragged down by the lowest denominator on the pitch why don't we try to raise the bar and meet the highest of standards?

Where have all the cowboys gone?

England don't even have joke candidates anymore...

Wanted: Football manager, preferably English or from the UK, for temporary role with chance of becoming full-time should they exceed expectations. Applicant must be happy just to have the job, respect his bosses (and their decisions), have good communication skills, and must be able to work under great media attention including turning up at your house/work/children's school/in fake sheikh fancy dress.

Everyone knows England lacks top class managers and coaches. The Premier League only contains the sixty-somethings Harry Redknapp and Roy Hodgson and 50-year-old Alan Pardew. The Championship, often neglected when English managerial talent is mentioned, is full of plenty of local talent but until they step up to the pressures and expectations of the Premiership it would be a massive gamble to give them the top job in the country.

Or so you would think. Jurgen Klinsmann, and his successor Jogi Low have little success at club level but they have had success with the German national team. Frank Rijkaard and Marco van Basten have coached the Netherlands with less success while France often promoted coaches from Clairfontaine with varying levels of management experience.

International management is a different game to club management. The demands are different, the skills needed are different, the job is simply different, as Capello found to his cost and Harry Redknapp, favoured to take over either in the medium or long term, may find out as well. Should we be looking for a different type of manager?

Stuart Pearce is only signed on for the friendly against Holland at the end of the month - too short an experiment to find out whether his exposure to international management, albeit with the U21s, has taught him skills that would make him successful at senior level. Pearce was not a failure at Man City but nor was he a rip roaring success, and with the U21s he has taken England to three successive Euro championships which, like the senior team, was never a guarantee in the past.

Promoting the U21 coach would be a novel approach for the FA, but what about someone like Sir Trevor Brooking or Gareth Southgate? Men who have played for England, suffered the tournament heartbreak, both have some management experience, and both know about the machinations of the FA. They would be company men, toe the line, and perhaps step away from the media glare and with the reduced pressure they may perform better.

How about other ex pros? Alan Shearer? Paul Ince? Tony Adams? Sure, you wouldn't actually want them to take control of England, but why aren't they getting mentioned? Why aren't they getting involved in the international setup as coaches, assistant coaches etc. Maybe the calamity at the FA stops any long term planning, so Noel Blake at the U19s won't step up to the U21s and we don't get that conveyor-belt going.

Perhaps Redknapp being the obvious candidate makes all discussion mute and the expectations of the media and the fans for the next England manager to be the messiah (and when he fails, for the next guy to be the messiah, and so on...) cuts off a lot of potential candidates. But that doesn't mean we should not have the debate. we should be talking about all the managers, exploring all the paths they can take to the England job, and how those paths can be opened up and multiplied.

Even the joke candidates have their uses. The debate is as important as the decision. But with Harry the only man for the job, we will get stuck in the same cycles as before.

Has Capello helped Spurs keep Redknapp?

Fabio Capello's resignation has come as a shock. I am disappointed the man lacked the balls to continue with the England job. What would he have done if John Terry had picked up a season ending injury? Talk about man on a ledge....

Anyway, sod Capello, let's think about the man who is the bookies and media's favourite to take the England job. The man who was acquitted of tax evasion this morning. The only English manager to experience Champions League football since Howard Wilkinson or something daft. The man named Harry Redknapp.

Spurs fans were naturally worried that the man who rescued them from the calamitous reign of Juande Ramos, had built a stellar squad including Rafa van der Vaart, Gareth Bale, Luka Modric et al and achieved Tottenham's best Premiership finish would leave for the England job after Euro 2012. Who would replace Harry? How would the players deal with the loss of their adored manager?

Rumours are already sprouting that Redknapp will take temporary charge of England in Poland and Ukraine. This could be the best scenario for both Spurs fans and Harry. Redknapp could fulfil the dream of managing England at a major tournament. With only four months until the tournament starts he will avoid most of the hassle of being England manager, the media will not have any matches or performances to sink their teeth into, and England could walk into Euro 2012 with the media (save Rob Beasley) on their side. Then when it all goes tits up Harry can return to Spurs, content in the knowledge that he gave it his best shot but international management just wasn't his cup of tea, and the England team lacks the skill that his Tottenham team contains by the barrel load.

Spurs fans meanwhile will keep their successful manager, the players will have that continuity, and with England only playing one friendly before the end of the season (the home game against the Netherlands at the end of February) he will not be absent from the Tottenham training ground for long.

Conversely, what if the FA appoint another caretaker manager and that mean takes England to the semi finals or better? The clamour will be for that man (likely Stuart Pearce) to stay in charge, and Harry stays at White Hart Lane.

Or Redknapp may well turn the temporary job and the FA, feeling burned by that rejection, my not offer the job to Redknapp in the summer.

Either way, Capello's resignation could be the best news Tottenham fans have heard since this morning.

Spurs get lucky with Young Boys

Young Boys 3-2 Tottenham Hotspur

As a Spurs fan, that was horrendous. Never mind the first thirty minutes that found Tottenham three goals down, the entire game was a defensive shambles. And whatever happens, do not blame the pitch.

The AstroTurf pitch simply exacerbated fundamental flaws in the setup of the London team which were not helped by some very poor individual decisions. Young Boys started at a very high tempo, but were very compact and did not use the flanks. Spurs on the other hand went with a traditional 4-4-2 formation with wingers hugging the touch line. This was the first mistake, and is a lesson that needs to be learnt.

- 4-4-2 does not work away from home in Europe

Villareal and an under-cooked Fiorentina gave Spurs a few lessons at the Lane. Tottenham's away record at the top teams has been terrible for many, many years. And yet Harry Redknapp went with an offensive 4-4-2 against the team from Bern. He, and the players, showed a lack of respect and awareness. For that first thirty minutes Spurs could not get on the ball. Young Boys' 5 man midfield were far more fluid, and Tottenham did not press as a team.

- Pavlyuchenko and Defoe should not play together against strong teams.

Neither player was impressive. Neither player showed a good enough touch in build up play nor in front of goal. Neither player worked hard. Nor did they get back and close down the holding midfielder, stopping Young Boys from progressing their play up the pitch.

The Russian, apart from the movement and finish for his goal, was woeful. Defoe still looked a little off pace. The half chances that did come their way did not manage a meaningful effort on goal. If they are not scoring, they offer nothing. However....

- Keane is the key

I'm not saying he should start every week. But when the opposition has men behind the ball, and more men in midfield, the Irishman's ability to drop deep and get play going motivates the rest of the team to increase their off the ball movement. Keane did not hesitate to come to the half way line and take the ball of the centre backs and get involved with the central midfielders. His markers did not know whether to stick or twist, and his lay-off for the second goal was excellent, and was the first link up between any of our strikers.

- Huddlestone is a giant

Palacios and Modric were out numbered, but the Honduran did not help his game by being wasteful in possession and poor in defence. The holding role does not suit him as he wants to step up and press the ball and ends up caught in a no-man's land that contributed to the second and third goals we conceded. Only when Huddlestone came on after thirty minutes did Spurs look assured on the ball, slowing the tempo when needed and providing good positional awareness when needed.

He is not yet vocal enough to be a midfield general, but his game has improved to the extent that others now take their lead from him.

- You cannot play high and not press.

The second and third goals also exploited a lack of pace at the back. Even if Spurs had Usain Bolt at the back, it's easy to out pace someone when they have to turn 180 degrees. However, when there is pressure on the ball it is harder for the opposition to play the perfect ball for the runners to run on to.

As said above, Spurs were out numbered in midfield and the strikers were not helping out. The back line should have dropped, therefore, keeping the play in front of them. Instead they tried to push up and were exposed. Once again a lack of respect and awareness saw Spurs concede two unnecessary goals.

- The Internationals did not help.

Some players are still suffering from a World Cup hangover. With an early start to the Premiership season, plus mid week internationals before the season had begun, some players are lacking the sharpness needed. This was Spurs' second competitive game - Young Boys are on 7 already.

- Hurry Up Sandro

Tottenham's only summer signing, Sandro is due to arrive after the second leg of the Copa Libertadores. The defensive midfielder would be the perfect addition to a three man midfield and would have cut off the two through balls for the Swiss team's second and third goals. When Spurs make the switch to 4-3-3/4-5-1, he could be key



All is not lost. Pavlyuchenko's late goal makes Spurs favourites at a packed White Hart Lane. With a more traditional surface and the crowd behind them, you would expect Spurs to win, maybe by a couple of goals. However, if they cannot address those defensive issues and the naivety of manager and players, this season will be anything but Glory Glory.