Deposed Wolves manager will find it hard to get back into management
Dear, dear Mick....just when I encouraged you to be more attacking and play two strikers upfront, you go all silly and chuck on three for the Black Country derby. What were you thinking?
The Yorkshireman crumbled under the pressure. After Kevin Doyle scored the winner against QPR last week McCarthy mistakenly thought that he had finally found the winning formula. Attack. Attack attack attack. The three striker system that overcame the West London club and secured a vital three points would be the system to overcame a well drilled West Brom side that was more successful on the road than back at their Hawthorns ground. As a theory, it contained some glaring holes.
Firstly, QPR were down to ten men. Wolves had actually started with their typical 4-5-1 formation and only injury and necessity saw that change. Wolves grabbed a goal straight after the restart, and even at 2-1 it could be said they did not have the game all their own way.
Against West Brom McCarthy's men were exposed from the first whistle. They only went in at half time level thanks to good goalkeeping from Wayne Hennessey and the killer instinct from Steven Fletcher, two players who are unlikely to leave the Premiership anytime soon even if Wolves do.
Once Jonas Olsson made it 3-1 Wolves were always liable to get hit on the counter, but McCarthy can have no complaints for his sacking. As stated in my piece six days ago McCarthy had spent money and accumulated a good squad that was understandably expected to perform better.
But where now for the former Republic of Ireland Manager? At 53 he could be said to be entering the prime of his managerial career but if he wants to get back on to the managerial rollercoaster he will have to step down a level. Steady building does not excite the mind like beating the odds against relegation, or the euphoria of taking a team (or teams) up to the Premiership. Wolves did not go up in a blaze of glory, they did not dazzle in the Premiership, and McCarthy's dour demeanour leaves a lasting impression for all the wrong reasons.
It's harsh to criticise a man who carried himself with a lot of dignity. Responsibility was accepted, bad luck was balanced with good, plaudits handed out to opponents when appropriate, and when the fans got on his back McCarthy allowed them their rights. There is much to admire but not much to find attractive about the ex-Sunderland boss.
That disastrous 2005-06 campaign sticks in the memory, when the Black Cats secured only 16 points in 28 games under McCarthy, as does the falling out with Roy Keane in the World Cup. McCarthy lacks the youthfulness, vigour, and perceived tactical knowledge that appears to be in vogue at the moment. It's easy to forget that he turned round a middling Wolves side that was failing to live up to expectations under Glenn Hoddle. However, that type of job, a job McCarthy would be best suited to, is likely to be offered to a younger man untainted by past failings and one has to wonder whether McCarthy wants another grinding job.
Management is a young man's game these days and a seasoned vet like McCarthy may find it hard to get his foot back in the door. After 20 years as a manager and 25 as a player, including 57 caps for the Republic of Ireland, McCarthy should enjoy some down time and hope his absence makes a chairman's heart grow fonder. Unfortunately for Mick, I don't think he will ever be remembered fondly enough.
Showing posts with label World Cup. Show all posts
Showing posts with label World Cup. Show all posts
Tuesday, 14 February 2012
Monday, 16 August 2010
Let Capello get on with the job
The fall out from the World Cup refuses to go away. The media enjoyed five minutes slating the players, but realising that the players would be around a little longer and any continued onslaught would see the stars boycott interviews, end columns and move to more 'friendlier' papers, they had to stop. Their next move was obvious, and one they have tried before - blame the foreigner!
They fell in love with the Italian after finding the wally with the brolly incompatible. But like any spurned lover, or should we say stalker, they hit back with a vengeance. Capello's problem was he did not play the media game. He was obnoxious, arrogant, and dismissive. He did not care about them, and cared even less about their opinion. That was fine when results were positive but the hacks were sharpening their knives for when it went wrong.
In a sense, Capello only has himself to blame. The title winning manager had ruled with conviction but when it came to naming a 30 man preliminary squad and then a final 23 there was an air of desperation. All the strategic planning went out the window. Suddenly Capello realised that England were primed to get through the qualifying group, but no thought had been given to the finals.
This is certainly not a new phenomenon. England have consistently underperformed in major tournaments, when they have qualified. While Germany accept indifferent qualification results but expect and receive excellent tournament performances, England seem to focus on the opposite. Most teams England face should pose little to no threat, even with third choice keepers, uncapped strikers and backup centre backs.
Instead, Capello played a non-goalscoring striker who he then had to drop, and found that relying on Rooney against determined opposition was inadequate. His slow central midfield pairing of Lampard and Barry, along with an egotistical and erratic Terry, were totally exposed. And the only changes he made were like for like.
Has Capello learnt his lesson? The friendly against Hungary saw a 4-5-1/4-3-3 attempted for the most part. Ironically it was when we switched back to 4-4-2 that we conceded. A few new caps were handed out, and fringe players received game time. But when it comes to the qualifiers against Bulgaria and Switzerland, will Capello continue with the in vogue formation, or switch to the tried and tested (and failed)?
Either way, slating him every five minutes is hardly helping. Such is the psyche of the English media (and too many fans it has to be said) that even a 0-0 half time score in a friendly is met with thousands of boos. England could have played worse and been 2-0 up. What would the fans have done then?
The media has lost respect for him, that is abundantly clear. Now he is simply an easy target. I'm not sure convincing wins in the remaining internationals of the year will satisfy a blood-thirsty press.
If those journalists were true fans they would see the Italian's failings, but they would also give him the support. England have not won anything for a long time. They have not really been close to winning anything for a long time. Maybe its not the manager's fault, maybe the players are not good enough. Either way, getting on their backs is not helping!
They fell in love with the Italian after finding the wally with the brolly incompatible. But like any spurned lover, or should we say stalker, they hit back with a vengeance. Capello's problem was he did not play the media game. He was obnoxious, arrogant, and dismissive. He did not care about them, and cared even less about their opinion. That was fine when results were positive but the hacks were sharpening their knives for when it went wrong.
In a sense, Capello only has himself to blame. The title winning manager had ruled with conviction but when it came to naming a 30 man preliminary squad and then a final 23 there was an air of desperation. All the strategic planning went out the window. Suddenly Capello realised that England were primed to get through the qualifying group, but no thought had been given to the finals.
This is certainly not a new phenomenon. England have consistently underperformed in major tournaments, when they have qualified. While Germany accept indifferent qualification results but expect and receive excellent tournament performances, England seem to focus on the opposite. Most teams England face should pose little to no threat, even with third choice keepers, uncapped strikers and backup centre backs.
Instead, Capello played a non-goalscoring striker who he then had to drop, and found that relying on Rooney against determined opposition was inadequate. His slow central midfield pairing of Lampard and Barry, along with an egotistical and erratic Terry, were totally exposed. And the only changes he made were like for like.
Has Capello learnt his lesson? The friendly against Hungary saw a 4-5-1/4-3-3 attempted for the most part. Ironically it was when we switched back to 4-4-2 that we conceded. A few new caps were handed out, and fringe players received game time. But when it comes to the qualifiers against Bulgaria and Switzerland, will Capello continue with the in vogue formation, or switch to the tried and tested (and failed)?
Either way, slating him every five minutes is hardly helping. Such is the psyche of the English media (and too many fans it has to be said) that even a 0-0 half time score in a friendly is met with thousands of boos. England could have played worse and been 2-0 up. What would the fans have done then?
The media has lost respect for him, that is abundantly clear. Now he is simply an easy target. I'm not sure convincing wins in the remaining internationals of the year will satisfy a blood-thirsty press.
If those journalists were true fans they would see the Italian's failings, but they would also give him the support. England have not won anything for a long time. They have not really been close to winning anything for a long time. Maybe its not the manager's fault, maybe the players are not good enough. Either way, getting on their backs is not helping!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)